{5} Assigned, Active Tickets by Owner (Full Description) (203 matches)
List tickets assigned, group by ticket owner. This report demonstrates the use of full-row display.
Results (201 - 203 of 203)
Vladimir Prus (3 matches)
Ticket | Summary | Component | Milestone | Type | Created | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#3564 | bjam creates wrong library name when toolset choice is invalid | Building Boost | Boost 1.42.0 | Bugs | Oct 26, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hi, I just called boost using "bjam address-model=64 install --with-math link=static toolset=msvc-9 variant=debug" which creates libraries without any VC version number: --> libboost_math_tr1l-vc-mt-gd-1_40.lib which should be --> libboost_math_tr1l-vc90-mt-gd-1_40.lib This leads to auto-linking errors. The documentation at multiple points simply states that appending the MSVC version number to the toolset will work, however the correct syntax for the call is: "toolset=msvc-9.0" and not "toolset=msvc-9" The documentation for valid numbers is somewhat hidden as well (http://www.boost.org/boost-build2/doc/html/bbv2/reference/tools.html#bbv2.reference.tools.compiler.msvc). At least the toolset docu (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_40_0/more/getting_started/windows.html#identify-your-toolset) could use the above link! So, is it possible to introduce white-lists for the toolset options to avoid this kind of error?! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#1094 | Finding the correct library to link (feature request for pkg-config support)h | build | Boost 1.42.0 | Feature Requests | Jul 16, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This bug report is a feature request for the addition of pkg-config support to Boost, in order to provide a simple, reliable, platform-independent mechanism for discovering if the Boost libraries are installed, what they are called, where they are installed, and how to link with them. This is currently not possible to achieve. A detailed rationale and an example for how to implement this follow. I make use of several Boost libraries in my schroot program (svn://svn.debian.org/svn/buildd-tools/trunk/schroot). This project, like many, utilises GNU Autoconf and Automake for its build system. I need to determine how to link with the Boost libraries in order to build the programs in the project. This is an issue for many projects which want to link with a Boost library. Note that calling bjam is not a possibility here; it may not be installed, and most projects are not using bjam, especially if boost is just one of many libraries being used. To illustrate my problem:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 45 2007-07-08 11:48 /usr/lib/libboost_program_options-gcc41-1_34.so -> libboost_program_options-gcc41-1_34.so.1.34.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 2007-07-08 11:48 /usr/lib/libboost_program_options-gcc41-mt-1_34.so -> libboost_program_options-gcc41-mt-1_34.so.1.34.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 2007-07-08 11:48 /usr/lib/libboost_program_options-mt.so -> libboost_program_options-gcc41-mt-1_34.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2007-07-08 11:48 /usr/lib/libboost_program_options-st.so -> libboost_program_options-gcc41-1_34.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2007-07-08 11:47 /usr/lib/libboost_regex-gcc41-1_34.so -> libboost_regex-gcc41-1_34.so.1.34.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2007-07-08 11:47 /usr/lib/libboost_regex-gcc41-mt-1_34.so -> libboost_regex-gcc41-mt-1_34.so.1.34.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 2007-07-08 11:47 /usr/lib/libboost_regex-mt.so -> libboost_regex-gcc41-mt-1_34.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 2007-07-08 11:47 /usr/lib/libboost_regex-st.so -> libboost_regex-gcc41-1_34.so Unlike every other library on my system, the Boost libraries have the compiler (gcc41) and threading model (mt|st) and so on embedded *in the library name*. This makes it impossible to discover in an automatic fashion. Since my project is free software anyone can download and build, I don't know what the compiler/toolchain will be, let alone what abbreviation Boost has chosen for it. I expect that Autoconf will set up such things appropriately; my code is relatively compiler-agnostic, but I can't predict the Boost library names without help. The only means I have are the libboost_program_options-mt.so, libboost_program_options-st.so (and so on for all the libraries) symbolic links which the Debian maintainer has helpfully provided. However, these are not portable, and are so not a good solution. They are, however, the only available solution at the moment. To further show the problem I am having, this is part of my configure.ac Autoconf template: ---configure.ac---- AC_CHECK_HEADERS([tr1/memory]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/shared_ptr.hpp] [
AC_CHECK_HEADERS([tr1/tuple]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/tuple/tuple.hpp] [
AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/format.hpp] [AC_MSG_ERROR([Boost.Format (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot])]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/program_options.hpp] [AC_MSG_ERROR([Boost.Program_options (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot])]) AC_CHECK_HEADERS([boost/type_traits.hpp] [AC_MSG_ERROR([Boost.TypeTraits (Boost C++ Libraries) is not installed, but is required by schroot])]) AC_MSG_CHECKING([for boost::program_options::variables_map in -lboost_program_options-st]) saved_ldflags="${LDFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -lboost_program_options-st" AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM(<boost/program_options.hpp>,
LDFLAGS="${saved_ldflags}" AC_MSG_CHECKING([for boost::program_options::options_description::options() in -lboost_program_options-st]) saved_ldflags="${LDFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -lboost_program_options-st" AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM(<boost/program_options.hpp>,
])],
LDFLAGS="${saved_ldflags}" AH_TEMPLATE(BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DESCRIPTION_OLD, [Set if boost::program_options::options_description::options() is not available]) if test "$BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS_DESCRIPTION_METHODS" = "old"; then
fi AC_MSG_CHECKING([for boost::regex in -lboost_regex-st]) saved_ldflags="${LDFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -lboost_regex-st" AC_LINK_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM(<boost/regex.hpp>,
LDFLAGS="${saved_ldflags}" AC_SUBST([BOOST_LIBS]) ---configure.ac---- As you can see, that's quite a bit of complexity. It also includes code to work around a backwards compatibility issue in Boost.Program_options. However, it needs to know the library name in order to link the test code, and I'm still needing to use a non-standard name in order to do that. It would be great if Boost would provide a mechanism to allow such discovery. Such a mechanism already exists, and is called "pkg-config". By installing a small file in LIBDIR/pkgconfig for each Boost library, the pkg-config tool or PKG_CHECK_MODULES Autoconf macro may be used to query this information. As an example: prefix=/usr exec_prefix=${prefix} libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib includedir=${prefix}/include Name: boost-regex-mt Description: Boost C++ Regular Expression Library (multi-threaded) Version: 1.34.0 Libs: -L${libdir} -lboost_regex-gcc41-mt-1_34 Libs.private: -licui18n -licuuc -lrt -lm Cflags: -I${includedir} -pthread You can generate this from a template: prefix=PREFIX exec_prefix=EPREFIX libdir=LIBDIR includedir=INCLUDEDIR Name: boost-regex-mt Description: Boost Regular Expression Library (multi-threaded) Version: VERSION Libs: -L${libdir} LIBRARY_NAME Libs.private: LIBRARY_DEPENDENCIES [for static linking] Cflags: -I${includedir} THREAD_OPTIONS_FOR_COMPILER where the capitalised names are where you would substitute in the system- and compiler-specific options. It looks like bjam could probably make this a single rule all libraries could make use of. For such a setup, all that configure script above could be mostly reduced to
I don't know how bjam works, but I do this with Autoconf as a file generated by config.status, but it could also be generated by make with a simple sed command. I guess you could do the bjam equivalent, whatever that might be. I have had a look at the sources to try to implement this, but I am afraid I lack the bjam expertise to do it. You may find much more detailed discussion of these issues at
Some of these are due to Debian-specific issues (a change to the symlink name), but the root cause is the inability to identify the Boost library names in an automated fashion. Regards, Roger --
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#2746 | Please allow specifying the library SONAME in Jamroot | build | Boost 1.39.0 | Feature Requests | Feb 11, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In working on packaging the luabind library (which utilizes Boost.Jam) for Debian, I found the way that the library SONAME is passed to the linker is not "correct." It seems like since the SONAME is something that should ideally be managed by the library developer, it would be good if Boost.Jam allowed the library SONAME to be specified in the Jamroot file (for operating systems that have a notion of a SONAME). Here is the related thread from the luabind-user mailing list: http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c20090131051842.GA15718%40connexer.com%3e Thanks to some help from volodya in IRC, we worked up the patch from the first message in the above thread. However, I think that some sort of configuration variable, that if set, allowed specifying the SONAME would be better. In the absence of the SONAME being specified in the Jamroot file, the current behavior could be kept as default. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||