id summary reporter owner description type status milestone component version severity resolution keywords cc 11906 BOOST_TEST() violates expectations about expression lifetime bspencer@… Raffi Enficiaud "The new BOOST_TEST() macro is a step in a great direction. However, because of how the macro expands to multiple expressions, it leads to simple checks performing undefined behaviour. For example, consider the following complete test program: {{{ #define BOOST_TEST_MAIN #include struct Object { Object() : m_value(""A value for this string to have"") {} const std::string &get() const { return m_value; } private: std::string m_value; }; BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(test) { BOOST_TEST(Object().get() == ""check""); } }}} This program fails because only a ""const std::string &"" is captured for the left-hand side of the test, and then, in a separate expression (in the expanded BOOST_TEST() macro), that reference is used to evaluate the expression. This fails because the temporary Object has already been dereferenced. Compare to BOOST_CHECK() with the same content (or BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL() with a comma instead of ""==""). This kind of subtlety makes it difficult to write safe checks with BOOST_TEST(). Example valgrind output from the above program: {{{ ==24714== Invalid read of size 8 ==24714== at 0x4EF3C2E: std::string::compare(char const*) const (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.20) ==24714== by 0x414160: operator==, std::allocator > (basic_string.h:2540) ==24714== by 0x414160: eval (assertion.hpp:162) ==24714== by 0x414160: value (assertion.hpp:348) ==24714== by 0x414160: evaluate (assertion.hpp:357) ==24714== by 0x414160: test::test_method() (foo.cc:19) ==24714== by 0x414529: test_invoker() (foo.cc:17) ==24714== by 0x4294BA: operator() (function_template.hpp:771) ==24714== by 0x4294BA: operator() (execution_monitor.ipp:1304) ==24714== by 0x4294BA: boost::detail::function::function_obj_invoker0::invoke(boost::detail::function::function_buffer&) (function_template.hpp:138) ==24714== by 0x40ABEC: operator() (function_template.hpp:771) ==24714== by 0x40ABEC: do_invoke, boost::function > (execution_monitor.ipp:281) ==24714== by 0x40ABEC: boost::execution_monitor::catch_signals(boost::function const&) (execution_monitor.ipp:870) ==24714== by 0x40AC98: boost::execution_monitor::execute(boost::function const&) (execution_monitor.ipp:1207) ==24714== by 0x40B376: boost::execution_monitor::vexecute(boost::function const&) (execution_monitor.ipp:1313) ==24714== by 0x410F31: boost::unit_test::unit_test_monitor_t::execute_and_translate(boost::function const&, unsigned int) (unit_test_monitor.ipp:46) ==24714== by 0x43A332: boost::unit_test::framework::state::execute_test_tree(unsigned long, unsigned int) (framework.ipp:685) ==24714== by 0x43A466: boost::unit_test::framework::state::execute_test_tree(unsigned long, unsigned int) (framework.ipp:636) ==24714== by 0x41C4A1: boost::unit_test::framework::run(unsigned long, bool) (framework.ipp:1220) ==24714== by 0x41C8AE: boost::unit_test::unit_test_main(boost::unit_test::test_suite* (*)(int, char**), int, char**) (unit_test_main.ipp:228) ==24714== Address 0x5a11a50 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 56 free'd ==24714== at 0x4C2A360: operator delete(void*) (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==24714== by 0x41433B: _M_dispose (lazy_ostream.hpp:35) ==24714== by 0x41433B: ~basic_string (basic_string.h:547) ==24714== by 0x41433B: ~Object (foo.cc:4) ==24714== by 0x41433B: test::test_method() (foo.cc:19) ==24714== by 0x414529: test_invoker() (foo.cc:17) ==24714== by 0x4294BA: operator() (function_template.hpp:771) ==24714== by 0x4294BA: operator() (execution_monitor.ipp:1304) ==24714== by 0x4294BA: boost::detail::function::function_obj_invoker0::invoke(boost::detail::function::function_buffer&) (function_template.hpp:138) ==24714== by 0x40ABEC: operator() (function_template.hpp:771) ==24714== by 0x40ABEC: do_invoke, boost::function > (execution_monitor.ipp:281) ==24714== by 0x40ABEC: boost::execution_monitor::catch_signals(boost::function const&) (execution_monitor.ipp:870) ==24714== by 0x40AC98: boost::execution_monitor::execute(boost::function const&) (execution_monitor.ipp:1207) ==24714== by 0x40B376: boost::execution_monitor::vexecute(boost::function const&) (execution_monitor.ipp:1313) ==24714== by 0x410F31: boost::unit_test::unit_test_monitor_t::execute_and_translate(boost::function const&, unsigned int) (unit_test_monitor.ipp:46) ==24714== by 0x43A332: boost::unit_test::framework::state::execute_test_tree(unsigned long, unsigned int) (framework.ipp:685) ==24714== by 0x43A466: boost::unit_test::framework::state::execute_test_tree(unsigned long, unsigned int) (framework.ipp:636) ==24714== by 0x41C4A1: boost::unit_test::framework::run(unsigned long, bool) (framework.ipp:1220) ==24714== by 0x41C8AE: boost::unit_test::unit_test_main(boost::unit_test::test_suite* (*)(int, char**), int, char**) (unit_test_main.ipp:228) }}}" Bugs closed To Be Determined test Boost 1.59.0 Problem duplicate