Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #12400, comment 5
- Timestamp:
- Oct 11, 2016, 8:23:24 AM (6 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #12400, comment 5
initial v1 1 your code seams to be false because RIP (address of co tnext-fn) is stored AS RIP in 0x30(%rax).1 your code seams to be false because RIP (address of context-fn) is stored AS RIP in 0x30(%rax). 2 2 the address of the 'finish' label is stored as the return address for the context-fn (e.g. if the context-fn returns, a branch to label 'finish' happens).