id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,milestone,component,version,severity,resolution,keywords,cc
12810,feature parity between boost::intrusive_ptr and boost::interprocess::intrusive_ptr,mikolaj.krzewicki@…,Ion Gaztañaga,"Dear all, i'd like to request to bring boost::interprocess::intrusive_ptr interface up to the level of boost::intrusive_ptr, more specifically to add the move operators and e.g. release() method, as discussed on the mailing list (copy below).
thanks,
Mikolaj

On 13/01/2017 13:42, Mikolaj Krzewicki wrote:
> Dear all,
> would it be possible to add the rvalue operators to
> interprocess::intrusive_ptr akin to what is already available in
> ""regular"" boost::intrusive_ptr:
>
> // Move support
>
> #if !defined( BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES )
>
>     intrusive_ptr(intrusive_ptr && rhs) BOOST_NOEXCEPT : px( rhs.px )
>     {
>         rhs.px = 0;
>     }
>
>     intrusive_ptr & operator=(intrusive_ptr && rhs) BOOST_NOEXCEPT
>     {
>         this_type( static_cast< intrusive_ptr && >( rhs ) ).swap(*this);
>         return *this;
>     }
>
> #endif

Sure, please fill a ticket so this is not forgotten.

Best,

Ion ",Feature Requests,new,To Be Determined,intrusive,Boost Release Branch,Not Applicable,,"interprocess, intrusive_ptr",