id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,milestone,component,version,severity,resolution,keywords,cc
13170,BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_TEMPLATE don't want typedef for list,Oleksandr Guteniev <gutenev@…>,Raffi Enficiaud,"It is possible to test several types using BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_TEMPLATE

{{{
typedef boost::mpl::list<int,long,unsigned char> test_types;

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_TEMPLATE( my_test, T, test_types )
{
  BOOST_TEST( sizeof(T) == (unsigned)4 );
}
}}}

But if I don't want to introduce a typedef not used elsewhere, as every individual test would have separate type list:

{{{
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_TEMPLATE( 
   my_test, 
   T,
   boost::mpl::list<
     int,
     long,
     unsigned char
   > )
{
  BOOST_TEST( sizeof(T) == (unsigned)4 );
}
}}}
The code above doesn't compile though due to comma in macro. It can be worked around, but workarounds seems to be worse than having extra typedef.

I propose using variadic macro for types parameter and make the example above compiling.
",Feature Requests,closed,Boost 1.67.0,test,Boost 1.61.0,Cosmetic,fixed,,