Opened 21 years ago
Last modified 13 years ago
#17 closed Feature Requests (fixed)
Socket wrapper class — at Initial Version
Reported by: | nobody | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Component: | asio | |
Version: | None | Severity: | Problem |
Keywords: | Cc: | chris@… |
Description
Hello, I have only recently found boost.org. I spent the first 4 years of my programming life in Smalltalk; I LOVED it and was very sad to see it (virtually) die. In the last (very painful) year I have been working in C++. A very smart friend of mine once told me "there is no sbustitute for hard work". I have been working hard in C++ and I am starting to get it ... a little bit. What I miss from Smalltalk is the abstraction. I have just begun my exploration of Templates and Containers/Iterators/Algorightms and I am very excited; they give back to me some of the abstraction I had in Smalltalk. I have not noticed any Networking abstractions here. I was just reading http://www.cuj.com/current/feature.htm?topic=current which is an article about wrapping sockets. Does boost.org have any thoughts/interest in providing this sort of functionality? I would enjoy using abstract networking classes. If boost.org does not have the time/resources to do it at the moment I would be happy to contribute code, once my code is worth contributing. I suppose I should join. Are there issues with wrapping such topics that I prevent (a) useful implementation(s)? I apologize if this is not the appropriate place to submit this thought or if I have missed the networking section somewhere. This is a great site and I look forward to using/contributing to boost.org! Tyler Ford digital comms firmware engineer at Agilent Technologies 707-577-2998
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.