Boost C++ Libraries: Ticket #2150: Inspect needs to check for missing files https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150 <p> Objective: Report missing files early enough to take corrective action before a crisis develops. Include generated doc files in the lists searched for. </p> <p> Design: Top level "required_files.txt" points to "required_files.txt" in subdirectories. That way the root/required_files.txt only has to be edited when a library is added. </p> <p> See attached file for possible "required_files.txt" format. </p> en-us Boost C++ Libraries /htdocs/site/boost.png https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150 Trac 1.4.3 Beman Dawes Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:52:50 GMT attachment set https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150 <ul> <li><strong>attachment</strong> → <span class="trac-field-new">required_files.txt</span> </li> </ul> <p> Tentative format for "required_files.txt" </p> Ticket Beman Dawes Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:54:31 GMT status changed https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150#comment:1 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150#comment:1 <ul> <li><strong>status</strong> <span class="trac-field-old">new</span> → <span class="trac-field-new">assigned</span> </li> </ul> Ticket Steven Watanabe Fri, 08 Apr 2011 01:55:04 GMT <link>https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150#comment:2 </link> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150#comment:2</guid> <description> <p> What problem exactly is this supposed to solve? I don't see this providing benifits equal to the extra maintainence burden it creates. </p> </description> <category>Ticket</category> </item> <item> <dc:creator>viboes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:10:48 GMT</pubDate> <title>component changed https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150#comment:3 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2150#comment:3 <ul> <li><strong>component</strong> <span class="trac-field-old">Regression Testing</span> → <span class="trac-field-new">inspection script</span> </li> </ul> Ticket