id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,milestone,component,version,severity,resolution,keywords,cc
2454,Fusion - MSVC level 1 warnings,Paul A. Bristow,Joel de Guzman,"I am seeing a far number of what MS regard as level 1 (most severe) warnings from various fusion files, for example:

i:\trunk\boost/fusion/iterator/next.hpp(60) : warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored
i:\trunk\boost/fusion/sequence/intrinsic/begin.hpp(64) : warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored
i:\trunk\boost/fusion/sequence/intrinsic/begin.hpp(71) : warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored
i:\trunk\boost/fusion/sequence/intrinsic/end.hpp(64) : warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored
i:\trunk\boost/fusion/sequence/intrinsic/end.hpp(71) : warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored
i:\trunk\boost/fusion/iterator/prior.hpp(60) : warning C4180: qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored

I doubt if it is worth changing/correcting the code, but users will be justifiably alarmed, especially if, as in my case, I am not explicitly using Fusion!

However I am unclear how best to suppress these warnings, short of a lot of push'n'pop pragmas into a lot of files.  Is this not a problem on gcc?
",Patches,closed,To Be Determined,fusion,Boost 1.40.0,Cosmetic,wontfix,fusion warnings,