Boost C++ Libraries: Ticket #2780: Is state_saver.hpp redundant? https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2780 <p> Is boost/serialization/state_saver.hpp redundant now that there is a boost/state_saver.hpp ? </p> <p> The implementations are identical, should the one in serialization now be factored out? </p> en-us Boost C++ Libraries /htdocs/site/boost.png https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2780 Trac 1.4.3 Robert Ramey Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:19:41 GMT status changed; resolution set https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2780#comment:1 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2780#comment:1 <ul> <li><strong>status</strong> <span class="trac-field-old">new</span> → <span class="trac-field-new">closed</span> </li> <li><strong>resolution</strong> → <span class="trac-field-new">fixed</span> </li> </ul> <p> LOL Due to strident criticism of my action to add state_saver to boost - I moved state_saver to boost/serialization/state_saver. So its boost/state_saver which should now be factored out. </p> <p> Robert Ramey </p> Ticket