Boost C++ Libraries: Ticket #2964: Making mutexes and lock header-only https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964 <p> As discussed in the <a class="ext-link" href="http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2009/04/150524.php"><span class="icon">​</span>mailing list</a>, it would be nice if mutexes and locks provided by Boost.Threads were made header-only and not dependent on the library binary module. </p> en-us Boost C++ Libraries /htdocs/site/boost.png https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964 Trac 1.4.3 bgreen0@… Mon, 18 May 2009 18:34:56 GMT cc set https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:1 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:1 <ul> <li><strong>cc</strong> <span class="trac-author">bgreen0@…</span> added </li> </ul> Ticket Ulrich Eckhardt Thu, 28 May 2009 05:53:15 GMT cc changed https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:2 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:2 <ul> <li><strong>cc</strong> <span class="trac-author">Ulrich Eckhardt</span> added </li> </ul> <p> See also bug <a class="closed ticket" href="https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/3103" title="#3103: Feature Requests: Allow using libraries without separately compiling them (closed: wontfix)">#3103</a>, if this would work for you, I'd suggest closing this bug as a duplicate of it. </p> Ticket Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.boost@…> Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:43:47 GMT <link>https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:3 </link> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:3</guid> <description> <p> Replying to <a class="ticket" href="https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:2" title="Comment 2">eckhardt</a>: </p> <blockquote class="citation"> <p> See also bug <a class="closed ticket" href="https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/3103" title="#3103: Feature Requests: Allow using libraries without separately compiling them (closed: wontfix)">#3103</a>, if this would work for you, I'd suggest closing this bug as a duplicate of it. </p> </blockquote> <p> I don't think this is a dup, there's a significant difference between your proposal and asking for specific components to be header-only. </p> </description> <category>Ticket</category> </item> <item> <author>tim@…</author> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:15:42 GMT</pubDate> <title>cc changed https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:4 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:4 <ul> <li><strong>cc</strong> <span class="trac-author">tim@…</span> added </li> </ul> Ticket anonymous Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:08:53 GMT status changed; resolution set https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:5 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/2964#comment:5 <ul> <li><strong>status</strong> <span class="trac-field-old">new</span> → <span class="trac-field-new">closed</span> </li> <li><strong>resolution</strong> → <span class="trac-field-new">fixed</span> </li> </ul> <p> Fixed on trunk </p> Ticket