Opened 17 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
#426 closed Support Requests (fixed)
lambda vs pure virtual functions
Reported by: | sw_creator | Owned by: | No-Maintainer |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Component: | lambda | |
Version: | None | Severity: | Showstopper |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Hello all ! i tried to complile this code: ----------------------- namespace Filter{ class ResultType {...}; class SubExpression { public: virtual ResultType Result()=0; }; typedef boost::shared_ptr<SubExpression> SPtrSubExpression; ............ void F() { namespace la=boost::lambda; ResultType r; vector<SPtrSubExpression> v; .................................. vector<SPtrSubExpression>::const_iterator i=find_if(v.begin(), v.end(), la::bind(&SubExpression::Result, *la::_1)==r); } } ------------------------- and I received error: c:\Program Files\boost-1-32-0\boost\tuple\detail\tuple_basic.hpp(419): error C2259: 'Filter::SubExpression' : cannot instantiate abstract class complier :VC++ 7.1 boost 1.32.0 what's wrong? thanks.
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Component: | None → lambda |
---|---|
Description: | modified (diff) |
Owner: | changed from | to
Severity: | → Showstopper |
Status: | assigned → new |
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
comment:3 by , 12 years ago
Resolution: | None → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
This can't be completely fixed until #864 is resolved, since the sig protocol is incapable of handling abstract types.