https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/4360 <p> Please consider the attached patch, which will allow Codegear 2010 to pass the enable_error_info_test. The patch supports calling enable_error_info(T const &amp;), as long as T is <em>not</em> derived from <code>boost::exception</code>. Which seems like an acceptable limitation to me. Right? </p> <p> Note: The attached patch assumes that the little patch from <a class="closed ticket" href="https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/4344" title="#4344: Patches: [helper1.cpp] Please consider a qualified call to boost::enable_error_info (closed: fixed)">#4344</a> is also applied: <a class="ext-link" href="https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/4344/helper1_cpp_qualified_call_to_boost_enable_error_info.patch"><span class="icon">​</span>https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/4344/helper1_cpp_qualified_call_to_boost_enable_error_info.patch</a> </p> en-us /htdocs/site/boost.png https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/4360 Trac 1.4.3 niels_dekker Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:51:46 GMT https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/4360 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/4360 <ul> <li><strong>attachment</strong> → <span class="trac-field-new">enable_error_info_CodeGear2010.patch</span> </li> </ul> <p> Update: modifications of info.hpp and enable_error_info_test.cpp appear sufficient. </p> Ticket