id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,milestone,component,version,severity,resolution,keywords,cc
489,"many ""virtual functions vs. non-virtual destructor"" warnings",nobody,Robert Ramey,"{{{
Hello,

seems since RC1_1_33_0 the amount of warning has
increased once more.
Compling with gcc 4.02 with ""-Wall -pedantic""

It's pretty annyoing and floods the output unnecessary.
Other parts of boost dont have this problem...

---- snip ---
boost/boost/archive/binary_iarchive.hpp:33: warning:
'class boost::archive::binary_iarchive_i
mpl<boost::archive::binary_iarchive>' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
/home/rmichels/minimon/sdk/boost/boost/archive/binary_iarchive.hpp:76:
warning: 'class boost::archive::binary_iarchive'
has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor

boost/boost/archive/detail/common_oarchive.hpp:31:
warning: 'class boost::archive::detail::co
mmon_oarchive<boost::archive::binary_oarchive>' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
boost/boost/archive/basic_binary_oarchive.hpp:53:
warning: 'class boost::archive::basic_binar
y_oarchive<boost::archive::binary_oarchive>' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor

boost/boost/archive/basic_xml_iarchive.hpp:40: warning:
'class boost::archive::basic_xml_iarc
hive<boost::archive::xml_iarchive>' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor

boost/boost/archive/xml_iarchive.hpp:39: warning:
'class boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<bo
ost::archive::xml_iarchive>' has virtual functions but
non-virtual destructor

--------------------

There are some more ... 
Whats the purpose of not having virtual dtor but
virtual functions?
Could you please supply a solution, this stuff clutters
output much.

Regards,

A. Focht
}}}",Bugs,closed,,serialization,None,,Works For Me,,