https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/5896 <p> With C++11 now finalized as a standard, and compilers being more compliant every day, it makes sense to have range-based versions of the directory_iterator classes. This would make it much easier to use the range-based for loop, as well as Boost.Range functionality. </p> <p> Basically, it could just be a couple of helper functions that create a boost::iterator_range&lt;bfs::directory_iterator&gt; instance. </p> en-us /htdocs/site/boost.png https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/5896 Trac 1.4.3 Beman Dawes Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:26:00 GMT https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/5896#comment:1 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/5896#comment:1 <ul> <li><strong>status</strong> <span class="trac-field-old">new</span> → <span class="trac-field-new">assigned</span> </li> </ul> Ticket