Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 9 years ago
#6706 new Tasks
Mersenne Twister discard() speed improvement — at Initial Version
Reported by: | Owned by: | No-Maintainer | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | random |
Version: | Boost 1.48.0 | Severity: | Optimization |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
There is an algorithm for fast jump ahead for the MT:
http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/JUMP/index.html
Some more references (thanks Topher!)
Hiroshi Haramoto, Makoto Matsumoto, and Pierre L'Ecuyer. 2008. A Fast Jump Ahead Algorithm for Linear Recurrences in a Polynomial Space. In /Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Sequences and Their Applications/ (SETA '08), Solomon W. Golomb, Matthew G. Parker, Alexander Pott, and Arne Winterhof (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 290-298. DOI=10.1007/978-3-540-85912-3_26 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85912-3_26
An accessible online copy is at:
http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/ARTICLES/jump-seta-lfsr.pdf
If I understand it correctly, whether or not it is "constant time" is a bit ambiguous. Applying it to an arbitrary MT generator requires O(k1.6) where k is the size of the state, and k must be moderately large before this asymptote is approached. For a particular generator the k is a constant so it is "constant time" -- i.e., constant in the size of the jumps. So, for example, k for MT19937 is 19937 and so is k1.6 (about 7.5 million). The timing tests in the paper seem to indicate reasonable performance for common applications (e.g., where generating the jumps is done infrequently relative to the number of calls to the generators themselves).