Boost C++ Libraries: Ticket #7004: Linear (doubly linked) list support. https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/7004 <p> Please add support for non-circular doubly linked lists (so that the end iterator is always simply a null pointer). </p> en-us Boost C++ Libraries /htdocs/site/boost.png https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/7004 Trac 1.4.3 Ion Gaztañaga Wed, 29 May 2013 08:03:59 GMT <link>https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/7004#comment:1 </link> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/7004#comment:1</guid> <description> <p> I can't see the advantages of non-circular doubly-linked lists as complexity guarantees are very similar and usually null-ended lists are more complex to implement (null-end condition must be checked many times). Could you elaborate a bit more or point to some online documentation that shows the advantages of null-ended doubly linked lists? </p> </description> <category>Ticket</category> </item> <item> <dc:creator>Andrey Semashev</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:19:24 GMT</pubDate> <title/> <link>https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/7004#comment:2 </link> <guid isPermaLink="false">https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/7004#comment:2</guid> <description> <p> If the end() iterator contains NULL internally, then you are not able to decrement it, which is needed for back(), rbegin(), etc. </p> </description> <category>Ticket</category> </item> <item> <dc:creator>Ion Gaztañaga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 21:28:53 GMT</pubDate> <title>status changed; resolution set https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/7004#comment:3 https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/7004#comment:3 <ul> <li><strong>status</strong> <span class="trac-field-old">new</span> → <span class="trac-field-new">closed</span> </li> <li><strong>resolution</strong> → <span class="trac-field-new">wontfix</span> </li> </ul> <p> Reviewing old bugs, no other user has requested this feature in the mailing list so closing as WONTFIX. </p> Ticket