id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,milestone,component,version,severity,resolution,keywords,cc
7361,Forbid compilation of leaking mistake.,mjklaim@…,Vladimir Prus,"I was adding program_option to my prorgam when I discovered a related leak. Fortunately it was false positive, but it pointed a hidden problem.
I used:
 - Visual Studio 2012
 - Boost 1.51.0
 - Visual Leak Detector to detect the leak

This, generate the leak:


{{{
#include <boost/program_options.hpp>

int main()
{
	namespace bpo = boost::program_options;
	bpo::options_description options( ""Options"" );
	options.add_options()
			( ""test""		, ""Test."" )
		,	( ""value""		, bpo::value<int>(), ""Value."" )
		;

	
}
}}}


The second option is leaking. The reason is because of the comma in the beginning of the line. 
I first added it by reflex when using function arguments so it took me some time to find what was leaking.
Part of the time I spend was figuring out why it don't leak if you don't set a value type: 

{{{

#include <boost/program_options.hpp>

int main()
{
	namespace bpo = boost::program_options;
	bpo::options_description options( ""Options"" );
	options.add_options()
			( ""test""		, ""Test."" )
		,	( ""value""		, ""Value."" ) // no leak but still wrong!
		;

}

}}}

The main problem I see with this is that it is compiled without any problem nor warning.

So here is my question:
Would it be possible to forbid comma operator with options_description_easy_init?",Support Requests,new,To Be Determined,program_options,Boost 1.51.0,Problem,,,