Markus Schöpflin — Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:46:04 GMT

Logged In: YES
user_id=91733
to_duration() seems to have been fixed in the meantime. But
to_microduration() still contains the same problem. And
probably a merge or copy&past error, because the following
lines look suspect when compared with to_duration(). (Note
the duplicate call to xtime_get().)
...
res = boost::xtime_get(&cur, boost::TIME_UTC);
assert(res == boost::TIME_UTC);
if (boost::xtime_get(&cur, boost::TIME_UTC) <= 0)
  microseconds = 0;
else
...
The two functions look nearly identical anyway, can't this
be implemented in a generic manner?

status changed

martin_wille — Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:29:07 GMT

status assigned → closed

Logged In: YES
user_id=592361
I copied the fix from to_duration to to_microduration().
The duplicate function call had been removed before.
This should fix the problems reported in this thread.
The potential for some code cleanup remains.

Boost C++ Libraries: Ticket #74: timeconv.inl to_duration() nsec error

status changed