id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,milestone,component,version,severity,resolution,keywords,cc 7951,ranlux24_base(0) should be equal to ranlux24_base(),Stephan T. Lavavej ,Marshall Clow,"After fixing a bug in VC11's (see [1]), I compared VC's fixed output to Boost 1.52.0's output and I believe I found a bug in Boost. Here's a self-contained test case: {{{ C:\Temp>type meow.cpp #include #include #ifdef USE_BOOST #include using std::boolalpha; using std::cout; using std::endl; using boost::random::minstd_rand0; using boost::random::mt19937; using boost::random::ranlux24_base; #else #include using namespace std; #endif template typename Engine::result_type run_10k(Engine engine) { for (int i = 0; i < 9999; ++i) { engine(); } return engine(); } int main() { cout << boolalpha; #ifdef USE_BOOST cout << ""Using boost."" << endl; #else cout << ""Using std."" << endl; #endif cout << ""N3485 26.5.5 [rand.predef]/1 satisfied: "" << (run_10k( minstd_rand0()) == 1043618065) << endl; cout << ""N3485 26.5.5 [rand.predef]/3 satisfied: "" << (run_10k( mt19937()) == 4123659995) << endl; cout << ""N3485 26.5.5 [rand.predef]/5 satisfied: "" << (run_10k(ranlux24_base()) == 7937952 ) << endl; cout << ""I believe minstd_rand0(0) == minstd_rand0() should be true: "" << (minstd_rand0(0) == minstd_rand0()) << endl; cout << ""I believe mt19937(0) == mt19937() should be false: "" << (mt19937(0) == mt19937()) << endl; cout << ""I believe ranlux24_base(0) == ranlux24_base() should be true: "" << (ranlux24_base(0) == ranlux24_base()) << endl; cout << ""run_10k( minstd_rand0(0)): "" << run_10k( minstd_rand0(0)) << endl; cout << ""run_10k( mt19937(0)): "" << run_10k( mt19937(0)) << endl; cout << ""run_10k(ranlux24_base(0)): "" << run_10k(ranlux24_base(0)) << endl; } With my fixed build of Milan/VC12, I'm getting: C:\Temp>cl /EHsc /nologo /W4 /MTd meow.cpp meow.cpp C:\Temp>meow Using std. N3485 26.5.5 [rand.predef]/1 satisfied: true N3485 26.5.5 [rand.predef]/3 satisfied: true N3485 26.5.5 [rand.predef]/5 satisfied: true I believe minstd_rand0(0) == minstd_rand0() should be true: true I believe mt19937(0) == mt19937() should be false: false I believe ranlux24_base(0) == ranlux24_base() should be true: true run_10k( minstd_rand0(0)): 1043618065 run_10k( mt19937(0)): 1543171712 run_10k(ranlux24_base(0)): 7937952 (Note that VC11 RTM/Update 1 will suffer the bug described by [1].) If I use Boost's implementation with VC11 Update 1, I get: C:\Temp>cl /EHsc /nologo /W4 /MTd /DUSE_BOOST meow.cpp /I boost-1.52.0\include meow.cpp C:\Temp>meow Using boost. N3485 26.5.5 [rand.predef]/1 satisfied: true N3485 26.5.5 [rand.predef]/3 satisfied: true N3485 26.5.5 [rand.predef]/5 satisfied: true I believe minstd_rand0(0) == minstd_rand0() should be true: true I believe mt19937(0) == mt19937() should be false: false I believe ranlux24_base(0) == ranlux24_base() should be true: false run_10k( minstd_rand0(0)): 1043618065 run_10k( mt19937(0)): 1543171712 run_10k(ranlux24_base(0)): 14007167 }}} Here's why I believe that ranlux24_base(0) should be equal to ranlux24_base(). ranlux24_base is a subtract_with_carry_engine. 26.5.3.3 [rand.eng.sub]/7 says: ""explicit subtract_with_carry_engine(result_type value = default_seed); [...] linear_congruential_engine e(value == 0u ? default_seed : value);"" /7 doesn't refer to ""value"" anywhere else. Therefore, 0 should behave identically to the default_seed 19780503u. (For comparison, VC and Boost agree that minstd_rand0(0) == minstd_rand0(). 26.5.3.1 [rand.eng.lcong]/5 says: ""explicit linear_congruential_engine(result_type s = default_seed); [...] If c mod m is 0 and s mod m is 0, sets the engine's state to 1, otherwise sets the engine's state to s mod m."" The default_seed is 1u and minstd_rand0 sets c to 0, so that's why 0 behaves identically to the default_seed.) [1] http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/776456",Bugs,closed,Boost 1.54.0,random,Boost 1.52.0,Problem,fixed,,