id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,milestone,component,version,severity,resolution,keywords,cc
7966,static_assert: doc: nitpicking,Akim Demaille <akim.demaille@…>,John Maddock,"The following patch is really cosmetic.  The doc reads:

{{{
   BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT((std::numeric_limits<UnsignedInt>::digits >= 16)
                        && std::numeric_limits<UnsignedInt>::is_specialized
                        && std::numeric_limits<UnsignedInt>::is_integer
                        && !std::numeric_limits<UnsignedInt>::is_signed);
}}}

It does not make much sense, imho, to check {{{is_specialized}}} _after_ having already use {{{digits}}}.  I know all this is meant to fail, but it makes more sense to check {{{is_specialized}}} first, and the number of digits after we know this is an unsigned int. (FWIW, I would use four assertions, to facilitate the understanding of what failed).

Thanks for Boost, I'm a happy user!",Bugs,closed,To Be Determined,static_assert,Boost 1.52.0,Cosmetic,fixed,doc,