Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #8381, comment 4


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 4, 2013, 11:19:06 AM (10 years ago)
Author:
Hartmut Kaiser

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #8381, comment 4

    initial v1  
    22> I'm not sure what's the right solution for the problem. Should the method be removed? Or should the condition be tweaked? Or is there a better way?
    33
    4 The main question is this happening in the first place? Is it because gcc 4.7 in C++11 mode overeagerly instantiates this function without need? If this is the case, then we can't do anything than to wrap it into a proper preprocessor condition.
     4The main question is: why is this happening in the first place? Is it because gcc 4.7 in C++11 mode overeagerly instantiates this function without need? If this is the case, then we can't do anything than to wrap it into a proper preprocessor condition.