cc set

Mateusz Loskot — Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:39:34 GMT

cc mateusz@… added

awulkiew — Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:02:36 GMT

I pushed the implementation to the develop. However there is an edge case when both Boxes are Point-sized, e.g.: box(pt(0 0,0 0), pt(0 0,0 0)).

Spatial relations are well defined, e.g. touches() returns TRUE only if the interiors of both geometries do NOT overlap.

In the case of Polygons we know what to do because according to the OGC the Polygon must have an interior, its area can't be 0. Boxes are different, they're not defined in the OGC standard. Bounding objects in general may have no area/volume since they may be an envelop of a single Point. So we should decide how a Point-sized Box should be treated:

as a Point - no boundary, only the interior which means that touches for equal Point-sized Boxes should return FALSE.
as an Areal geometry without interior, only boundary which means that touches for equal Point-sized Boxes should return TRUE (currently this is implemented).

In general the handling of numerical errors is different for Box/Box cases, that is, currently in all functions the error is not taken into account. It's because the test should be as simple as possible. However this way the algorithm calculating some spatial relation for Geometries may be not compatible with the algorithm calculating it for bounding Boxes of those Geometries.

status changed; resolution set

awulkiew — Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:33:23 GMT

status new → closed
resolution → fixed

Added in 1.56 with the above remarks.

Boost C++ Libraries: Ticket #9941: bg::touches() for box geometries

cc set

status changed; resolution set