Changes between Version 11 and Version 12 of BoostEvo


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 9, 2014, 11:15:23 AM (8 years ago)
Author:
Beman Dawes
Comment:

Further tweak to case study intro

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • BoostEvo

    v11 v12  
    3636=== Case study ===
    3737
    38 This case study from Jeff Garland illustrates why many Boost libraries choose to support older compilers and standard libraries:
     38This case study from Jeff Garland illustrates why many Boost libraries leave old compiler and standard library workarounds in place as long as they do not prevent library evolution:
    3939
    4040 After three years of effort my project had finally put all (~1M sloc) of 1996 pre-standard legacy C++ to bed and started compiling most of our code in C++11 this year.  In large part, Boost was the tool that made that possible.  Because of Boost we were able to gradually move toward what would become the C++11 standard while hacking Boost code to work with our non-compliant compiler/std library…so that when we finally ported to g++4.8 and turned on C++11 it was just a handful of changes we had to make.  And now we’re successfully mixing plenty of C++11 with C++98 code in production use.