Changes between Version 91 and Version 92 of ReleasePractices/ManagerCheckList

Timestamp:

Feb 1, 2015, 9:15:37 AM (8 years ago)

Author:

Daniel James

Comment:

Make the repo file requirements a little clearer + mark up paths as code.

ReleasePractices/ManagerCheckList

@@ -86 +86 @@
 
     * The formal review manager is satisfied any requirements for inclusion set by the formal review have been met.
-    * root/libs/libraries.htm entry is OK, both in the alphabetic list and in the category lists.
-    * root/libs/maintainers.txt entry is OK.
-    * root/libs/xxx contains an index.html file with either the main docs or a redirection to the main docs.
-    * root/libs/meta/libraries.json is present and contents look reasonable. 
+    * `root/libs/libraries.htm` entry is OK, both in the alphabetic list and in the category lists.
+    * `root/libs/maintainers.txt` entry is OK.
+    * The repo contains an `index.html` file with either the main docs or a redirection to the main docs.
+    * `meta/libraries.json` is present in the repo and contents look reasonable. 
     * The primary docs pages meet Boost requirements and guidelines. Don't leave this until too late; it has turned up lots of issues in the past.
     * Inspection report is clean.