Changes between Version 96 and Version 97 of ReleasePractices/ManagerCheckList
- Timestamp:
- Jun 7, 2016, 7:21:34 PM (6 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
ReleasePractices/ManagerCheckList
v96 v97 78 78 * If the library already has a !GitHub repository, [https://help.github.com/articles/transferring-a-repository/ transfer the repository to boostorg]. Getting the maintainer to transfer into the organization is a bit awkward. So it might be best to first transfer the repo to an admin, who can then transfer it into the organization and set up the team. 79 79 * If the library does not already have a !GitHub repository, [https://github.com/organizations/boostorg/repositories/new Create the library's repository]. Note: the release manager creates a repository that is empty except for a readme file. The library's developer is responsible for creating the library's contents. 80 * [https://github.com/orgs/boostorg/new-team Create a team for the library].80 * Go into the repo settings, and make sure the owner has admin permissions. 81 81 82 82 === Add library as a submodule on boost develop branch === … … 96 96 97 97 * The formal review manager is satisfied any requirements for inclusion set by the formal review have been met. 98 * `root/libs/libraries.htm` entry is OK, both in the alphabetic list and in the category lists.99 * `root/libs/maintainers.txt` entry is OK.100 98 * The repo contains an `index.html` file with either the main docs or a redirection to the main docs. 101 99 * [http://www.boost.org/development/library_metadata.html `meta/libraries.json`] is present in the repo and contents look reasonable.