Changes between Version 8 and Version 9 of ReviewProcessRevisions

Timestamp:

May 25, 2014, 5:27:49 PM (8 years ago)

Author:

Gordon Woodhull

Comment:

paragraph breaks

ReviewProcessRevisions

@@ -43 +43 @@
 
 > A message might be as simple as "Is there any interest in a library which solves Traveling Salesperson problems in linear time?"
+
 > A bit of further description or snippet of code may be helpful. Messages should be plain text; not rich text, HTML, etc.
+
 > Please don't post lengthy descriptions, documentation, or code to the mailing list, and no attachments, even small ones. Please make lengthy material available on the web. You can use a project hosting service such as sourceforge, github, google code, bitbucket etc.
 
@@ -65 +67 @@
 
 > Discuss, refine, resubmit. Repeat until satisfied.
+
 > The exact details of this process varies a lot. Sometimes it is public, on the mailing list, sometimes a lot of discussion happens in private emails. For some libraries the process is over quickly, for others it goes on for months.  It's often challenging, and sometimes leads off in completely unexpected directions.
+
 > The archive of past messages is one way to see how this process worked for other Boost libraries.
 
@@ -133 +137 @@
 
 >       * Privately to the Review Manager.
+
 > Private comments to a library submitter may be helpful to her or him, but won't help the Review Manager reach a decision, so the other forms are preferred.