PK»�@®à•cë result_of.patchUT³ËwOµUMs›0=W¿BG1@ì|º¥Ôc·ãÌø�ØcÈLnŒE£©@Œ$hýï+™¹Mâ`’î�о]½}+Í‹ ùÀ5çR *EUÛÁ†¨„²� ²b ó SED¢ÈÉCY‚/o7àûþ!? Aj*)/àhtõñÜ®ëåÿ“‹´øS^n0™@ÿbè� »{N&¶öu±ˆb¼\âÙíÝ ^NWÓ›µ“óx¶šÆóÅ-r<µ-I‘äÆÎ@©D•*ØÆ¯Qw¨Ø1Ƙ—,h†CàÛ¬v“\àR‰KN ½¹ðzì™aNò58«ŠTiŠö~Ã1p-ÆÁ¥–6T�§x�O�C¸G”¶–Ar^œÖIûéiv^zOÌ& ˜7ºet-[ (¢a36ÓôÛ%ØóZíæùT¥§ŸÎ�LÍëêQ§ 1Q¬9ù†§Q4[ÅéÚJÍnhå§K½«3.•À5º÷Ò‡D8mutÝõw�°Š8Î羸éÿ¢û— ¡é‹Ž˜ðPÍéæå_Íò¯N°¨fçZ�Œ'ª7Ï@ ’u‚69^je¸gËö ;"Ü;óøÁ‚ö¤ÿ`QÝ~¼¿Q(Ñö÷¿‡®"ú$Õ7Úðj͈�ÖŒûuOÊ ¹wûtÚ8> ýPK»�@®à•cë S¤result_of.patchUT³ËwOThis patch fixes the inconsistency. This patch also fixes the test so that the patched `result_of` passes the test. `BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT((is_same::type, int>::value));` is removed, since this is uncallable. (`BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT((is_same::type, int>::value));` is kept untouched.)PK™!