boost_1_34_1 regex library compile failure on aix with xlv

[jareg.dao@…]

I made some modification, to make the compile success. Because i'am not familar with the boost regex source,is all the mondification right?

basic_regex.hpp 266 : old : #if !defined(BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATES) 266 : new : #if !defined(BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATES) && !defined(IBMCPP)

regex_traits.hpp 79 : old : #if !defined(BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION) && !BOOST_WORKAROUND(HP_aCC, BOOST_TESTED_AT(55500))

79 : new : #if !defined(BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION) && !BOOST_WORKAROUND(HP_aCC, BOOST_TESTED_AT(55500)) && !defined(IBMCPP)

iterator_category.hpp 68: old template <class I> struct is_random_access_iterator { private:

typedef detail::is_random_imp_selector< ::boost::is_pointer<I>::value> selector; typedef typename selector::template rebind<I> bound_type; typedef typename bound_type::type answer;

public:

BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = answer::value);

};

68: new template <class I> struct is_random_access_iterator { private:

typedef detail::is_random_imp_selector< ::boost::is_pointer<I>::value> selector; typedef typename selector::template rebind<I> bound_type;

public:

typedef typename bound_type::type answer; BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool, value = answer::value);

};

[John Maddock]

The changes shouldn't do any harm certainly: however I don't believe they should be needed with an up to date xlc compiler version.

Can you let me know what value IBMCPP evaluates to?

John.

[John Maddock]

Boost.Regex is building OK with the current xlc release, so I'm closing this one down, please reopen if you really need support for older xlc releases.