Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#12160 closed Bugs (duplicate)
failed to compile "threading-multi" on ppc64
Reported by: | Owned by: | Raffi Enficiaud | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | test |
Version: | Boost 1.60.0 | Severity: | Showstopper |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Hi All, the system ppc64, Power8, Redhat-7.2/64-bit, boost version 1.60.0:
common.mkdir bin.v2/libs/test/build/gcc-4.8.5/release/threading-multi gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/test/build/gcc-4.8.5/release/threading-multi/execution_monitor.o In file included from /usr/include/fenv.h:114:0,
from /usr/include/c++/4.8.2/fenv.h:36, from ./boost/detail/fenv.hpp:97, from ./boost/test/execution_monitor.hpp:64, from ./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp:31, from libs/test/src/execution_monitor.cpp:16:
./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp: In function ‘unsigned int boost::fpe::enable(unsigned int)’: ./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp:1383:7: error: expected id-expression before ‘(’ token
::feclearexcept(BOOST_FPE_ALL);
./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp: In function ‘unsigned int boost::fpe::disable(unsigned int)’: ./boost/test/impl/execution_monitor.ipp:1420:7: error: expected id-expression before ‘(’ token
::feclearexcept(BOOST_FPE_ALL);
"g++" -ftemplate-depth-128 -O3 -finline-functions -Wno-inline -Wall -pedantic -pthread -fPIC -m64 -Wno-variadic-macros -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_CHRONO_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_SYSTEM_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_SYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED -DBOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_TIMER_DYN_LINK=1 -DNDEBUG -I"." -c -o "bin.v2/libs/test/build/gcc-4.8.5/release/threading-multi/execution_monitor.o" "libs/test/src/execution_monitor.cpp"
...failed gcc.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/test/build/gcc-4.8.5/release/threading-multi/execution_monitor.o...
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
Component: | threads → test |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
comment:3 by , 6 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Closing as duplicate, as I strongly believe this is addressed by #11756. Feel free to reopen if needed.
Hi there,
Do you think it is a duplicate of #11756 ?