Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#12360 new Bugs
dead code detected by coverity in mersenne_twister
Reported by: | Owned by: | No-Maintainer | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | random |
Version: | Boost 1.54.0 | Severity: | Optimization |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
This is from boost 1.54 - it would be wise to re-test this on the development trunk to ensure it is still there before resolving it. This would be considered a trivial performance optimization by removing a branch.
{ assignment: Assigning: j = 623UL. const: At condition j < 623UL, the value of j must be equal to 623. dead_error_condition: The condition j < 623UL cannot be true. 430 for(std::size_t j = n-1-unroll_extra2; j < n-1; j++) { CID 10152 (#1 of 1): Logically dead code (DEADCODE)dead_error_begin: Execution cannot reach this statement: y = (this->x[j] & 0x8000000.... 431 UIntType y = (x[j] & upper_mask) | (x[j+1] & lower_mask); 432 x[j] = x[j-(n-m)] ^ (y >> 1) ^ ((x[j+1]&1) * a); 433 } 434 }
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
comment:2 by , 5 years ago
This definitely is a spurious warning. The code in question may or may not be dead depending on the template parameters.
comment:3 by , 5 years ago
If you want to close it out that's fine. I just checked and found that boost is not covered in Coverity Scan. I think it would be really useful, especially given each boost project is separate in github, to have a Coverity Scan project covering each boost project. It is a useful tool that finds problems, and you can never have enough quality controls on software.
I don't think there's enough information here to make a change. Can you tell me what the caller, etc was doing?