Opened 5 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#13481 new Bugs
Strict aliasing is causing SIGSEGV on ARM Cortex-A15 when using GCC6
Reported by: | Owned by: | Douglas Gregor | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | function |
Version: | Boost 1.66.0 | Severity: | Problem |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Hello,
I've been tracking a crach after upgrading GCC to 6.4 which was caused by corruption of the object stored inside boost::function
.
I think that the root cause for this is in the function_buffer
storage. You see, there is a char member there with the intention of "relax aliasing constraints" as it states in the comment but if my understanding of the standard is correct, it doesn't really do that. Quote from the C++:
If a program attempts to access the stored value of an object through a glvalue of other than one of the following types the behavior is undefined: 52 — the dynamic type of the object, — a cv-qualified version of the dynamic type of the object, — a type similar (as defined in 4.4) to the dynamic type of the object, — a type that is the signed or unsigned type corresponding to the dynamic type of the object, — a type that is the signed or unsigned type corresponding to a cv-qualified version of the dynamic type of the object, — an aggregate or union type that includes one of the aforementioned types among its elements or non- static data members (including, recursively, an element or non-static data member of a subaggregate or contained union), — a type that is a (possibly cv-qualified) base class type of the dynamic type of the object, — a char or unsigned char type.
There is indeed a char
type along other things that may be aliased safely, but function_buffer
is an union
with char
member so it falls into:
an aggregate or union type that includes one of the **aforementioned** types
so the function_buffer
itself can't be aliased. There was similar bug on GCC: 77686 (I'm unable to put links here) which was fixed by applying may_alias
attribute on their function_buffer
counterpart. Seems reasonable but after applying it to function_buffer
it was still failing but after reading GCC docs I think I've found out why:
may_alias Accesses through **pointers to types** with this attribute are not subject to type- based alias analysis, but are instead assumed to be able to alias any other type of objects. In the context of section 6.5 paragraph 7 of the C99 standard, an lvalue expression dereferencing such a pointer is treated like having a character type.
and there is BOOST_FUNCTION_FUNCTION::move_assign
function which does:
if (this->has_trivial_copy_and_destroy()) this->functor = f.functor;
and as it doesn't operate on the pointers, may_alias
seems to be simply ignored. So two things seems to fixing it (I hope they fix it, since the bug if quite "delicate" and it's easy to hide it by changing the code that doesn't seem relevant):
1) use gnu::may_alias
on function_buffer
and assign it trough some helper like this instead of union
s assign operator:
template<class T> void alias_safe_assign(T & dst, T & src) { dst = src; }
there is Richard's comment on GCC bugtracker: 77686#c12 where he's noted about std::swap
having a references so it seems to matter.
2) operate on data
member directly since it has relaxed aliasing requirements by being a char
. This doesn't even require GNU extensions.:
std::memcpy(this->functor.data, f.functor.data, sizeof(boost::detail::function::function_buffer));
Of course, putting a may_alias
on the functor type itself (the one that I'm assigning to boost::function
object) or putting this type into function_buffer
also fixes this.
I'm compiling the attached testcase using
arm-cortexa15-linux-gnueabihf-g++ (GCC) 6.4.1 20170811
and -O2 -fPIC
Br, Piotr.
Attachments (3)
Change History (8)
by , 5 years ago
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
by , 5 years ago
by , 5 years ago
Attachment: | boost_strict_aliasing_fix.patch added |
---|
Patch to fix the issue based on suggestion in original description
comment:2 by , 5 years ago
Hi, this fix was delivered to boost develop branch: https://github.com/boostorg/function/pull/15
Br, Piotr.
comment:3 by , 5 years ago
Ah, great!
Down at row 907 in the same file in assign_to_own there is a very similar assignment this->functor = f.functor; don't that one have to be updated as well?
comment:4 by , 5 years ago
I didn't noticed it before, yes, I believe we should do that. Do you mind creating a pull request?
We have a similar issue using a gcc 6.3 compiler from https://github.com/Broadcom/stbgcc-6.3/releases
In this case the issue does not reproduce with the attached bug.cpp but we have an another example, attached as crash.cpp which reproduces it with this compiler version when built with -O2 (and given that the issue seems quite sensitive to even small changes in the code I'm not surprised that slightly different compiler version requires different code to reproduce it). Adding -fno-strict-aliasing when building makes the issue go away.
Also, using the suggested change to do a memcpy on the data member instead of directly assigning the functor inside function_template.hpp does seem to resolve the issue.