Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#1440 closed Bugs (wontfix)
libs/config/test/link/Jamfile.v2 confuses process_jam_log
Reported by: | Dave Abrahams | Owned by: | John Maddock |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | None |
Version: | Boost 1.34.1 | Severity: | Problem |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
[ERROR ] # running checked system commands in /usr/local/src/boost-bitten/boost/status: ['"/usr/local/src/boost-bitten/tools_regression/build/bin/gcc-4.1.2/release/process_jam_log" "/usr/local/src/boost-bitten/results" <"/usr/local/src/boost-bitten/results/bjam.log"'] [INFO ] boost_root: /usr/local/src/boost-bitten/boost [ERROR ] Traceback (most recent call last): [INFO ] locate_root: /usr/local/src/boost-bitten/results [ERROR ] File "/usr/local/src/boost-bitten/run.py", line 52, in <module> [INFO ] *****Error - No "boost-test" lines encountered. [ERROR ] runner(root) [INFO ] (Usually occurs when bjam was envoked without the --dump-tests option
Is there a reason that can't be a regular link test? Does it have to be building a library? If the latter, can't we just make that library part of the requirements for a regular link test target?
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Dave, I'm closing this down now, please reopen if it's still an issue.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Dave,
That Jamfile tests the auto-linking code: it is very important that the library is not a dependency of the executable, since then we're not testing what we think we are :-(
Obviously this Jamfile only makes any sense for Windows compilers that support auto-linking, hence it's not part of status/Jamfile.v2.
John.