Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#2570 closed Bugs (fixed)
boost::interprocess::message_queue::timed_send and timed_receive bug
Reported by: | Owned by: | Ion Gaztañaga | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Boost 1.38.0 | Component: | interprocess |
Version: | Boost 1.37.0 | Severity: | Showstopper |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
In boost::interprocess::message_queue, the timed_send and timed_receive methods may return true without actually performing the send or receive operation.
The problem lies in boost/interprocess/ipc/message_queue.hpp, in the logic that handles blocking behavior for these two methods. Both implementations have the same form:
if (<operation-would-block>) {
switch(block){
... case timed : do{
if(!<condition-variable>.timed_wait(lock, abs_time))
return !<operation-would-block>;
} while (<operation-would-block>); break; ...
}
}
The problem is that when timed_wait returns false, it might be possible to complete the operation without blocking (i.e. there might be something in the queue in the case of receive, or the queue might not be full in the case of send). Therefore, in rare cases, timed_send/timed_receive return true, without having actually done any work.
My proposed fix is to change the timed case to:
do{
if(!<condition-variable>.timed_wait(lock, abs_time)) {
if(<operation-would-block>) {
return false;
} break;
}
} while (<operation-would-block>);
After I apply this change to my own boost install, the problem disappears.
I observed this bug on Linux (some Debian 4 flavor, 32-bit)
Change History (3)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Replying to igaztanaga:
Fixed in revision 50146
Fix for timed_send looks good.
Fix for timed_receive is missing curly-braces around the outer if body.
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Sorry! Fixed in revision 50194.
Fixed in revision 50146