Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#5845 closed Support Requests (invalid)
mutex.inl: wait_mutex (and its callers) ignore failures from WaitForSingleObject
Reported by: | Owned by: | viboes | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | thread |
Version: | Boost 1.47.0 | Severity: | Problem |
Keywords: | Cc: | noloader@…, viboes |
Description
inline int wait_mutex(void* mutex, int time) { unsigned int res = 0; res = WaitForSingleObject(mutex_cast(mutex), time); //:xxx assert(res != WAIT_FAILED && res != WAIT_ABANDONED); return res; }
Its callers are spread across a number of files, including mutex.cpp and recursive_mutex.cpp. Unfortunately, a common use case is shown below (taken from mutex.cpp):
void timed_mutex::do_lock() { wait_mutex(m_mutex, INFINITE); }
Not only does do_lock() ignore the return value, its callers will proceed to use the guarded data regardless of whether the lock was actually acquired.
do_trylock() does a little better, but still ignores return values such as ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE and WAIT_FAILED.
bool timed_mutex::do_trylock() { return wait_mutex(m_mutex, 0) == WAIT_OBJECT_0; }
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Component: | None → thread |
Owner: | set to |
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
Type: | Bugs → Support Requests |
Sorry, I don't see any file mutex.inl. Moved to support request until concerned file clarified.
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Closed as it seems these doesn't corresponds to the current Boost.Thread implementation.
assert(res == WAIT_OBJECT_0)
might be too tight -assert(res == WAIT_OBJECT_0 || res == WAIT_ABANDONED_0)
might be a better choice.