Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#7582 closed Bugs (fixed)
s/conform to the standard/more general/
Reported by: | Dave Abrahams | Owned by: | Antony Polukhin |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | Boost 1.53.0 | Component: | lexical_cast |
Version: | Boost 1.52.0 | Severity: | Cosmetic |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
In the FAQ: "By the way, it's a great opportunity to make your operator>> conform to the standard"
IMO it's wrong and a little insulting to suggest that such an operator>> doesn't *conform*. It simply doesn't work they way they want in the presence of a particular flag. That's very different
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
Severity: | Problem → Cosmetic |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | To Be Determined → Boost 1.53.0 |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | assigned → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
(In [81069]) Fix FAQ section of lexical_cast documentation (refs #7582)