Opened 9 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
#8564 new Bugs
Variable hiding errors within nested let blocks in Phoenix
Reported by: | Owned by: | Thomas Heller | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | phoenix |
Version: | Boost 1.53.0 | Severity: | Problem |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
I encounter errors when using nested let blocks in Phoenix whenever an "inner" local variable hides an "outer" local variable. The "Visibility" example from the documentation at http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/libs/phoenix/doc/html/phoenix/modules/scope/let.html also fails. Here is that "Visibility" example as a standalone module which fails:
#include <iostream> #include <boost/phoenix.hpp> namespace phoenix = boost::phoenix; using namespace phoenix::local_names; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { phoenix::let(_x = 1, _y = ", World") [ phoenix::let(_x = "Hello") // hides the outer _x [ std::cout << _x << _y // prints "Hello, World" ] ](); return 0; }
The errors I receive from GCC 4.7.2, GCC 4.8 snapshot, and Clang 3.2, with any of Boost 1.49, 1.53, or trunk, begin as follows:
GCC: "error: function returning an array"
Clang: "error: function cannot return array type 'result_type' (aka 'char [6]')"
Another failing example provided in Eric Niebler's Stack Overflow answer here is:
int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = 3)[ _a ]])(y);
...which contrasts with the following example; which does compile:
int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = _1)[ _a ]])(y);
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Further work has shown that these cases work as expected:
{ int z = 3; int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = _a)[ _a ]])(y); }
{ int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = _1)[ _a ]])(y); }
{ int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = 1)[_b]])(); } // This works....
but this case fails:
{ int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = 1)[_a]])(); }
Reference to _a in the inner loop is the problem, but only when _b is set to a constant!!
Further investigation is in progress.
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
Replying to John Fletcher <J.P.Fletcher@…>:
Further work has shown that these cases work as expected
{ int z = 3; int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = _a)[ _a ]])(y); }{ int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = _1)[ _a ]])(y); }{ int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = 1)[_b]])(); } // This works....but this case fails:
{ int y = 0; int x = (phoenix::let(_a = 1, _b = 2)[phoenix::let(_b = 1)[_a]])(); }Reference to _a in the inner loop is the problem, but only when _b is set to a constant!!
Further investigation is in progress.
Unfortunately it is not as easy as that. The 'working' cases above fail for some compilers e.g. clang 3.4 in C++03 but not C++11. gcc 4.8.2 works for C++03 and C++11. Work is in progress.
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
Apologies for the delay in giving further information. There is certainly a problem in Boost Phoenix V3 in the implementation of let and lambda. This shows up in various ways. In some cases code works when not optimised but fails when optimised - gcc 4.9.0 on -O1 and clang 3.5 on -O2. I know this is serious and I am working on it. The documentation is being revised and will be much more up to date with the next release of Boost.
This is indeed a bug and the examples given do not work. The solution is to use either an argument e.g _1 or a local variable e.g. _a to assign value to the local variable in the inner let.
These examples both work with the definitions
I will investigate further and also change the documentation. John