Opened 9 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#8704 closed Patches (fixed)
Using Phoenix lambdas on top of custom Proto expressions
Reported by: | Owned by: | Thomas Heller | |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | phoenix |
Version: | Boost 1.53.0 | Severity: | Problem |
Keywords: | phoenix proto | Cc: |
Description
Some prehistory:
I am working on VexCL (https :github.com/ddemidov/vexcl) - a vector expression template library for OpenCL. I have recently added support for automatic generation of OpenCL kernels from generic functors (description of the feature: https :github.com/ddemidov/vexcl#function-generator).
In order to implement this, I pass the instances of vex::symbolic<T> class to the given functor. vex::symbolic<T> dumps to output stream any arithmetic operations it is being subjected to, and that's how I am able to construct the OpenCL kernel source. The symbolic<T> class is of course a Boost.Proto terminal.
Now, it seems natural to use Boost.Phoenix to provide the generic functors for the function generator. And indeed it is possible with simple expressions (see https :github.com/ddemidov/vexcl/blob/a95dfdd68/tests/generator.cpp#L124). However, if I try to bring cmath functions overloads from <boost/phoenix/stl/cmath.hpp> and use those (https :github.com/ddemidov/vexcl/commit/b95da14e51), I get compilation errors. The reason apparently is that boost::phoenix_impl::<function>_impl assumes that result of <function>(expr) has the same type as expr itself. This of course is not true if expr is a Boost.Proto expression.
Everything works as intended with the following patch:
--- a/cmath.hpp +++ b/cmath.hpp @@ -25,11 +25,11 @@ namespace boost { struct result<This(BOOST_PHOENIX_A(n))> \ { \ typedef \ - typename proto::detail::uncvref<A0>::type \ + decltype( name(typename proto::detail::uncvref<A0>::type()) ) \ type; \ }; \ template<BOOST_PHOENIX_typename_A(n)> \ - A0 operator()(BOOST_PHOENIX_A_const_ref_a(n)) const { \ + auto operator()(BOOST_PHOENIX_A_const_ref_a(n)) const -> decltype( name(BOOST_PHOENIX_a(n)) ) { \ using namespace std; \ return name(BOOST_PHOENIX_a(n)); \ } \
I understand this is unacceptable in its current form (because it uses c++11 features), but I could not come up with other solution (e.g. in terms of boost::result_of).
Sorry for the broken links, Trac did not allow me to submit otherwise. Best regards, Denis
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
I have applied the patch and it is on test on develop
. The test cmath applies to this.
I had already applied #6665 which corrected an error for functions with more than 1 argument.
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
Hello,
Thank you very much for looking into this!
The VexCL test for Phoenix cmath functions (github.com/ddemidov/vexcl/blob/b95da14e51387e955ba83fd470f8677f9044c004/tests/generator.cpp#L125-L142) compiles and runs fine against github.com/boostorg/phoenix/commit/1ffca907da5842e2ebbbcf7155288ed60ffb75d8.
I do not know how to run native Boost.Phoenix tests though (in case this breaks anything).
Again, thanks!
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
Thank you for the feedback. I cannot test your bug directly, so it is very good to know your problem now works. All I can do is run the test cmath and see if it runs on different compilers, both C++03 and C++11. You can see that here:
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/phoenix.html
When it runs O.K. I will move it to master, hopefully in time for 1.56.0.
When I cannot see a general fix I am fixing for C++11 only.
John
comment:5 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I am applying your patch like this:
#ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX11_DECLTYPE <old code> #else <your patch> #endif
Do you have a test for it?