#8733 closed Feature Requests (fixed)
Testing for unprotected references to C99 math macros
| Reported by: | Owned by: | John Maddock | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | math |
| Version: | Boost Development Trunk | Severity: | Problem |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Attached is a way to test for unprotected references to C99 math macros on platforms where they are implemented as functions. Adding this to a released header would make it convenient to test new code for any omissions.
I used this to find the problems submitted in ticket #8732.
With, for example, fpclassify redefined, any unprotected references will expand out to a syntax error.
#define fpclassify(x) (another_fpclassify(x)) bad_call = boost::math::fpclassify(arg);
becomes
bad_call = boost::math::(another_flclassify(arg));
Attachments (1)
Change History (3)
by , 9 years ago
| Attachment: | math_fwd.hpp.patch added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.

simulate C99 math macros