Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#9249 closed Bugs (fixed)
BOOST_MPL_ASSERT is broken in VC12 (VC++2013RC)
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Aleksey Gurtovoy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone: | To Be Determined | Component: | mpl |
| Version: | Boost 1.55.0 | Severity: | Problem |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Code:
#include <boost/mpl/assert.hpp>
struct true_type {
static const bool value = true;
};
struct pred {
typedef true_type type;
};
static_assert(pred::type::value == true, ""); // ok
BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((pred)); // error (line #12)
Compiler output:
> cl /It:\_lib\boost\1_55_0b1 Source.cpp
Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 18.00.20827.3 for x86
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Source.cpp
t:\_lib\boost\1_55_0b1\boost/mpl/assert.hpp(149) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before '<'
t:\_lib\boost\1_55_0b1\boost/mpl/assert.hpp(153) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::mpl::eval_assert<Pred>' being compiled
t:\_lib\boost\1_55_0b1\boost/mpl/assert.hpp(149) : error C4430: missing type specifier - int assumed. Note: C++ does not support default-int
t:\_lib\boost\1_55_0b1\boost/mpl/assert.hpp(152) : error C2238: unexpected token(s) preceding ';'
t:\_lib\boost\1_55_0b1\boost/mpl/assert.hpp(159) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before '<'
t:\_lib\boost\1_55_0b1\boost/mpl/assert.hpp(163) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::mpl::eval_assert_not<Pred>' being compiled
t:\_lib\boost\1_55_0b1\boost/mpl/assert.hpp(159) : error C4430: missing type specifier - int assumed. Note: C++ does not support default-int
t:\_lib\boost\1_55_0b1\boost/mpl/assert.hpp(162) : error C2238: unexpected token(s) preceding ';'
Source.cpp(12) : error C2039: 'assert_arg' : is not a member of 'boost::mpl'
Source.cpp(12) : error C3861: 'assert_arg': identifier not found
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
It was fixed in r84443 in May, but that won't make any release compatible with VS2013. Can someone please merge that revision to the release branch?
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
This was eventually merged in r86514.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.

Well, it seems it was already fixed in trunk.
Sorry for false alert.