gcc 4.1.2 segfaults on mpl/test/apply.cpp

[troy d. straszheim]

Dunno what to do about this, but gcc 4.1.2 segfaults trying to compiler mpl/test/apply.cpp:

/home/troy/Projects/boost/boost_1_34_0/boost/mpl/aux_/preprocessed/gcc/template_arity.hpp: In instantiation of 'boost::mpl::aux::template_arity<T1>': /home/troy/Projects/boost/boost_1_34_0/libs/mpl/test/apply.cpp:63: instantiated from here /home/troy/Projects/boost/boost_1_34_0/boost/mpl/aux_/preprocessed/gcc/template_arity.hpp:98: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see <URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.1/README.Bugs>. Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/ccD8dpIR.out file, please attach this to your bugreport.

Im submitting a bug report.

Here's a, uh, "patch". Probably there's some way to mark this 'unusable' or whatever that I don't know about.

​http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/sandbox-branches/boost-cmake/boost_1_34_0/libs/mpl/test/apply.cpp

[Dave Abrahams]

Can't assign this to aleksey until he logs in and sets up his email address at ​http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/settings ;)

[Aleksey Gurtovoy]

Replying to troy:

Dunno what to do about this, but gcc 4.1.2 segfaults trying to compiler mpl/test/apply.cpp:

...

This was a know issue with gcc 4.1.0, which we assumed will be fixed in 4.1.2: ​http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/150790/. Apparently, it hasn't been.

Here's a, uh, "patch".

Could you please clarify what are you referring to as a "patch"? I followed the link below, but couldn't spot any relevant changes.

​http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/browser/sandbox-branches/boost-cmake/boost_1_34_0/libs/mpl/test/apply.cpp

Probably there's some way to mark this 'unusable' or whatever that I don't know about.

Yep, the existing explicit failures markup (​http://boost.cvs.sourceforge.net/boost/boost/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml?revision=1.561&view=markup) needs to be adjusted to include gcc 4.1.2.

[troy d. straszheim]

Here's a, uh, "patch".

Could you please clarify what are you referring to as a "patch"? I followed the link below, but couldn't spot any relevant changes.

I apologize for this... that's clearly not a patch, not even an "uh, patch". I was juggling a number of tickets and must have got confused.

[Steven Watanabe]

This was marked up in [40735].