Opened 14 years ago

Closed 14 years ago

#2780 closed Bugs (fixed)

Is state_saver.hpp redundant?

Reported by: anonymous Owned by: Robert Ramey
Milestone: Boost 1.39.0 Component: serialization
Version: Boost 1.38.0 Severity: Not Applicable
Keywords: state_saver Cc:

Description

Is boost/serialization/state_saver.hpp redundant now that there is a boost/state_saver.hpp ?

The implementations are identical, should the one in serialization now be factored out?

Change History (1)

comment:1 by Robert Ramey, 14 years ago

Resolution: → fixed
Status: new → closed

LOL Due to strident criticism of my action to add state_saver to boost - I moved state_saver to boost/serialization/state_saver. So its boost/state_saver which should now be factored out.

Robert Ramey

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.